Visual Arts

Early American video history is often characterized as difficult and heterogeneous, and this is in part due to the conflicting theoretical approaches to the notion of ‘medium’. In early 1970s New York, there were two major strands of discourse on video: one saw and described video through a techno-utopian lens based on Marshall McLuhan’s media theories, and the other, still steeped in the legacies of Clement Greenberg, treated video as though it was a static, flat and plastic medium. Neither was able to adequately articulate video’s unique aesthetics, but they nonetheless dominated the American language of video during the early 1970s. These opposing views on video eventually came to a head in 1974 at the Open Circuits conference at the Museum of Modern Art, where practitioners of early video, such as Frank Gillette and Douglas Davis, faced hostility from other artists and critics such as John Baldessari and Robert Pincus-Witten. They clashed around the concept of ‘medium’, with each side accusing the other of being formalist, and these dialogues spill out onto various publications throughout the same year. The article will argue that this conflict lies at the root of American video art’s difficulty with articulating its own history.

Could murder ever be a justifiable act? It would be hard to make an argument in which it is, but certainly not impossible. After all, do we not justify murder in war? What therefore is our tool for determining when, where, how, and why one could murder another human being? You could propose arguments based off of several different factors such as political, ideological, or as self defense. However, these arguments are limited to specific situations and they cannot account for a broader determining force that could be agreed upon as our marker for when murder is acceptable. There is one argument that attempts to provide us with such a broad tool and that is the argument for or against murder from the basis of morality. In this paper I will explore these themes through the lens of Alfred Hitchcock’s 1948 film Rope. In conjunction with the film we will investigate Friedrich Nietzsche’s argument for moral skepticism and how it drives the plot, themes, and motifs in the film.